Criticism of the National Health Service (England) > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Criticism of the National Health Service (England) includes concerns such as gain access to, waiting lists, health care protection, and numerous scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the openly financed healthcare system of England, developed under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour government of Clement Attlee. It has come under much criticism, specifically throughout the early 2000s, due to break outs of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the participation of the NHS in scandals extends back several years, consisting of over the provision of psychological healthcare in the 1970s and 1980s (ultimately part of the reason for the Mental Health Act 1983), and spends beyond your means on healthcare facility newbuilds, including Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the expense of which shot up from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]

Access controls and waiting lists

In making healthcare a mainly "undetectable expense" to the patient, healthcare seems to be successfully totally free to its consumers - there is no specific NHS tax or levy. To minimize costs and guarantee that everybody is treated equitably, there are a range of "gatekeepers." The basic specialist (GP) functions as a main gatekeeper - without a recommendation from a GP, it is typically impossible to gain higher courses of treatment, such as an appointment with a consultant. These are argued to be needed - Welshman Bevan kept in mind in a 1948 speech in your house of Commons, "we will never ever have all we need ... expectations will always go beyond capacity". [2] On the other hand, the nationwide medical insurance systems in other nations (e.g. Germany) have actually ignored the requirement for referral; direct access to an expert is possible there. [3]

There has actually been issue about opportunistic "health tourists" travelling to Britain (primarily London) and using the NHS while paying absolutely nothing. [4] British people have actually been understood to travel to other European nations to benefit from lower expenses, and since of a worry of hospital-acquired very bugs and long waiting lists. [5]

NHS gain access to is therefore controlled by medical top priority rather than cost system, leading to waiting lists for both consultations and surgery, up to months long, although the Labour government of 1997-onwards made it among its crucial targets to decrease waiting lists. In 1997, the waiting time for a non-urgent operation might be two years; there were ambitions to decrease it to 18 weeks in spite of opposition from doctors. [6] It is contested that this system is fairer - if a medical grievance is intense and life-threatening, a patient will reach the front of the line quickly.

The NHS determines medical need in regards to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), an approach of measuring the benefit of medical intervention. [7] It is argued that this approach of designating health care suggests some clients need to lose out in order for others to acquire, which QALY is a crude approach of making life and death choices. [8]

Hospital got infections

There have actually been numerous deadly outbreaks of antibiotic resistant bacteria (" extremely bugs") in NHS healthcare facilities, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile infection. [9] This has resulted in criticism of standards of hygiene across the NHS, with some clients buying personal health insurance or taking a trip abroad to prevent the perceived risk of capturing a "very bug" while in healthcare facility. However, the department of health promised ₤ 50 million for a "deep clean" of all NHS England hospitals in 2007. [10]

Coverage

The lack of schedule of some treatments due to their perceived poor cost-effectiveness in some cases results in what some call a "postcode lotto". [11] [12] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the very first gatekeeper, and analyze the expense efficiency of all drugs. Until they have actually released assistance on the expense and effectiveness of brand-new or pricey medicines, treatments and treatments, NHS services are not likely to use to fund courses of treatment. The very same of real of the Scottish Medicines Consortium, NICE's equivalent in Scotland. [13]

There has been significant debate about the public health funding of pricey drugs, significantly Herceptin, due to its high expense and viewed minimal total survival. The campaign waged by cancer victims to get the government to spend for their treatment has gone to the highest levels in the courts and the Cabinet to get it accredited. [14] [15] The House of Commons Health criticised some drug companies for generating drugs that cost on and around the ₤ 30,000 limit that is thought about the optimum worth of one QALY in the NHS.

Private Finance Initiative

Before the idea of personal finance effort (PFI) pertained to prominence, all brand-new hospital building was by convention funded from the Treasury, as it was believed it was best able to raise cash and able to manage public sector expenditure. In June 1994, the Capital Investment Manual (CIM) was published, setting out the regards to PFI contracts. The CIM made it clear that future capital jobs (structure of brand-new centers) needed to look at whether PFI was more effective to using public sector funding. By the end of 1995, 60 relatively little jobs had actually been prepared for, at an overall cost of around ₤ 2 billion. Under PFI, buildings were built and serviced by the economic sector, and then rented back to the NHS. The Labour federal government elected under Tony Blair in 1997 embraced PFI tasks, believing that public spending required to be curtailed. [16]

Under the private finance effort, an increasing number of hospitals have actually been developed (or rebuilt) by economic sector consortia, although the government also encouraged economic sector treatment centres, so called "surgicentres". [17] There has actually been considerable criticism of this, with a study by a consultancy business which works for the Department of Health showing that for every single ₤ 200 million invested on independently financed healthcare facilities the NHS loses 1000 doctors and nurses. The very first PFI medical facilities consist of some 28% less beds than the ones they changed. [18] Along with this, it has been kept in mind that the return for building and construction companies on PFI contracts could be as high as 58%, which in funding medical facilities from the personal rather than public sector cost the NHS nearly half a billion pounds more every year. [19]

Scandals

Several prominent medical scandals have actually occurred within the NHS over the years, such as the Alder Hey organs scandal and the Bristol heart scandal. At Alder Hey Children's Hospital, there was the unauthorised elimination, retention, and disposal of human tissue, consisting of kids's organs, between 1988 and 1995. The official report into the incident, the Redfern Report, exposed that Dick van Velzen, the Chair of Foetal and Infant Pathology at Alder Hey, had ordered the "unethical and illegal stripping of every organ from every child who had had a postmortem." In response, it has been argued that the scandal brought the issue of organ and tissue donation into the public domain, and highlighted the advantages to medical research that result. [20] The Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal of the 1990s related to opioid deaths. [21]

The Stafford Hospital scandal in Stafford, England in the late 2000s concerned unusually high death rates among clients at the health center. [22] [23] As much as 1200 more clients died between 2005 and 2008 than would be expected for the type and size of medical facility [24] [25] based on figures from a mortality model, but the final Healthcare Commission report concluded it would be misleading to link the insufficient care to a specific number or variety of varieties of deaths. [26] A public inquiry later on revealed multiple circumstances of overlook, incompetence and abuse of clients. [27]

" Lack of self-reliance of checking for security and physical fitness for purpose"

Unlike in Scotland and Wales which have degenerated health care, NHS England is worked on behalf of the taxpayer by the UK Parliament and the Department of Health, at the head of which is the Secretary of State for Health.

The group charged in England and Wales with inspecting if the care delivered by the NHS is truly safe and fit for function is the Care Quality Commission, or CQC. Although the CQC explains itself as the "independent regulator of all health and social care services in England" [1], it is in truth "accountable to the general public, Parliament and the Secretary of State for Health." [2] Archived 31 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine and much of its funding originates from the taxpayer. A minimum of one chairman, one chief executive [3] and a board member [4] of the CQC have actually been singled out for attention by a UK Secretary of State for Health.

There is therefore the potential for a dispute of interest, as both the NHS and the CQC have the exact same leadership and both are extremely susceptible to political disturbance.

In April 2024, Health Secretary Victoria Atkins urged NHS England to prioritize proof and safety in gender dysphoria treatment following concerns raised by the Cass Review. NHS required cooperation from adult clinics and started an evaluation, with Labour supporting evidence-based care. Momentum criticized limitations on gender-affirming care, while Stonewall invited the review's focus on kids's well-being. [28] [29]

See likewise

National Health Service
List of hospitals in England
Healthcare in the UK
Private Finance Initiative
Care Quality Commission


Notes

^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "TCSR 07 - Health: The General Public Expects". theinformationdaily.com. 24 September 2007. Archived from the original on 22 August 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Schneider, Antonius; Donnachie, Ewan; Tauscher, Martin; Gerlach, Roman; Maier, Werner; Mielck, Andreas; Linde, Klaus; Mehring, Michael (9 June 2016). "Costs of collaborated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: results of a routine data analysis in Bavaria". BMJ Open. 6 (6 ): e011621. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011621. PMC 4908874. PMID 27288386.
^ "Tougher rules to guarantee that individuals do not abuse NHS services". Medical News Today. 26 April 2004. Archived from the original on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Health travelers might get refund". BBC News Online. 7 December 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Jones, George (21 February 2007). "Doctors attack Blair's waiting list promise". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)". National Library for Health. March 2006. Archived from the original on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "So what is a QALY?". Bandolier. Archived from the original on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Do health centers make you ill?". BBC News. 31 January 2019.
^ "Hospital deep cleaning under fire". 14 January 2008.
^ "NHS 'postcode lottery game'". politics.co.uk. 9 August 2006. Archived from the initial on 7 September 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Why some drugs are not worth it". BBC News. 9 March 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Cancer drug declined for NHS usage". BBC News Online. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Q&A: The Herceptin judgement". BBC News. 12 April 2006. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ "Update on Herceptin appraisal". National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Archived from the initial on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 1 December 2006.
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "New generation surgery-centres to bring out thousands more NHS operations every year". Department of Health. 3 December 2002. Archived from the initial on 5 March 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ George Monbiot (10 March 2002). "Private Affluence, Public Rip-Off". The Spectator. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
^ PublicFinance.co.uk. "PFI hospitals 'costing NHS extra ₤ 480m a year'". Retrieved 3 December 2014.
^ Dixon, B. (19 March 2001). "Checks and balances needed for organ retention". Current Biology. 11 (5 ): R151 - R152. Bibcode:2001 CBio ... 11. R151D. doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822( 01 )00078-1. PMID 11267877.
^ "Gosport medical facility deaths: Police corruption probe flawed, guard dog states". BBC News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
^ Nick Triggle (6 February 2013). "Stafford Hospital: Hiding errors 'ought to be criminal offense'". BBC. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Robert Francis QC (6 February 2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Report). House of Commons. ISBN 9780102981476. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Smith, Rebecca (18 March 2009). "NHS targets 'may have resulted in 1,200 deaths' in Mid-Staffordshire". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the initial on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
^ Emily Cook (18 March 2009). "Stafford hospital scandal: Approximately 1,200 might have died over "shocking" client care". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
^ "How numerous individuals passed away "needlessly" at Mid Staffs". Full Fact. 7 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
^ Sawer, Patrick; Donnelly, Laura (2 October 2011). "Boss of scandal-hit health center gets away interrogation". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the initial on 3 October 2011.
^ "Minister tells NHS to 'end culture of secrecy' on gender care as focus shifts to adult centers". Morning Star. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
^ "NHS England should end 'culture of secrecy' in children's gender care". The National. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
References

Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.


External links

NHS.


Further reading

Pollock, Allyson (2004 ). NHS plc: the privatisation of our health care. Verso. ISBN 1-84467-539-4.
Mandelstam, Michael (2006 ). Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned. Jessica Kingsley Publishing. ISBN 1-84310-482-2.