Criticism of the National Health Service (England) > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Criticism of the National Health Service (England) includes concerns such as access, waiting lists, healthcare coverage, and different scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the openly funded healthcare system of England, developed under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour federal government of Clement Attlee. It has come under much criticism, specifically throughout the early 2000s, due to break outs of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the participation of the NHS in scandals extends back lots of years, consisting of over the provision of psychological healthcare in the 1970s and 1980s (ultimately part of the reason for the Mental Health Act 1983), and spends beyond your means on hospital newbuilds, consisting of Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the expense of which soared from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]

Access controls and waiting lists

In making health care a largely "unnoticeable expense" to the patient, healthcare appears to be successfully free to its consumers - there is no specific NHS tax or levy. To minimize expenses and ensure that everyone is treated equitably, there are a range of "gatekeepers." The family doctor (GP) works as a main gatekeeper - without a referral from a GP, it is frequently difficult to acquire higher courses of treatment, such as a visit with an expert. These are argued to be required - Welshman Bevan noted in a 1948 speech in the House of Commons, "we will never have all we need ... expectations will constantly surpass capacity". [2] On the other hand, the national medical insurance systems in other nations (e.g. Germany) have ignored the need for referral; direct access to a specialist is possible there. [3]

There has been issue about opportunistic "health travelers" travelling to Britain (primarily London) and using the NHS while paying absolutely nothing. [4] British residents have been understood to take a trip to other European nations to take advantage of lower costs, and due to the fact that of a fear of hospital-acquired very bugs and long waiting lists. [5]

NHS gain access to is therefore controlled by medical top priority rather than rate mechanism, causing waiting lists for both assessments and surgery, approximately months long, although the Labour government of 1997-onwards made it one of its key targets to reduce waiting lists. In 1997, the waiting time for a non-urgent operation could be two years; there were ambitions to decrease it to 18 weeks regardless of opposition from medical professionals. [6] It is contested that this system is fairer - if a medical problem is acute and dangerous, a patient will reach the front of the line rapidly.

The NHS measures medical requirement in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), a method of measuring the benefit of medical intervention. [7] It is argued that this method of designating healthcare means some clients should lose out in order for others to get, and that QALY is a crude technique of making life and death choices. [8]

Hospital got infections

There have actually been a number of deadly break outs of antibiotic resistant bacteria (" extremely bugs") in NHS hospitals, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile infection. [9] This has actually caused criticism of standards of hygiene across the NHS, with some clients purchasing private health insurance coverage or taking a trip abroad to avoid the viewed danger of capturing a "extremely bug" while in health center. However, the department of health promised ₤ 50 million for a "deep clean" of all NHS England healthcare facilities in 2007. [10]

Coverage

The absence of availability of some treatments due to their viewed bad cost-effectiveness often causes what some call a "postcode lotto". [11] [12] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the very first gatekeeper, and analyze the cost efficiency of all drugs. Until they have actually released assistance on the cost and effectiveness of brand-new or pricey medications, treatments and treatments, NHS services are unlikely to use to fund courses of treatment. The same of true of the Scottish Medicines Consortium, NICE's counterpart in Scotland. [13]

There has been considerable controversy about the general public health financing of costly drugs, notably Herceptin, due to its high cost and perceived restricted total survival. The campaign waged by cancer sufferers to get the federal government to pay for their treatment has gone to the highest levels in the courts and the Cabinet to get it accredited. [14] [15] Your House of Commons Health Select Committee criticised some drug companies for generating drugs that cost on and around the ₤ 30,000 limitation that is thought about the optimum worth of one QALY in the NHS.

Private Finance Initiative

Before the idea of private financing effort (PFI) pertained to prominence, all brand-new hospital building was by convention funded from the Treasury, as it was believed it was best able to raise cash and able to manage public sector expenditure. In June 1994, the Capital Investment Manual (CIM) was published, setting out the regards to PFI contracts. The CIM made it clear that future capital tasks (structure of brand-new facilities) needed to look at whether PFI was more effective to using public sector funding. By the end of 1995, 60 fairly small projects had been prepared for, at a total expense of around ₤ 2 billion. Under PFI, buildings were built and serviced by the economic sector, and then rented back to the NHS. The Labour government chosen under Tony Blair in 1997 welcomed PFI jobs, thinking that public costs required to be cut. [16]

Under the private finance effort, an increasing number of health centers have actually been built (or rebuilt) by economic sector consortia, although the government also motivated economic sector treatment centres, so called "surgicentres". [17] There has been considerable criticism of this, with a study by a consultancy company which works for the Department of Health revealing that for each ₤ 200 million spent on privately financed health centers the NHS loses 1000 doctors and nurses. The very first PFI health centers consist of some 28% fewer beds than the ones they changed. [18] As well as this, it has actually been noted that the return for building companies on PFI contracts could be as high as 58%, which in funding health centers from the personal rather than public sector cost the NHS nearly half a billion pounds more every year. [19]

Scandals

Several prominent medical scandals have actually happened within the NHS over the years, such as the Alder Hey organs scandal and the Bristol heart scandal. At Alder Hey Children's Hospital, there was the unauthorised removal, retention, and disposal of human tissue, consisting of kids's organs, between 1988 and 1995. The main report into the incident, the Redfern Report, revealed that Dick van Velzen, the Chair of Foetal and Infant Pathology at Alder Hey, had actually purchased the "dishonest and prohibited stripping of every organ from every child who had actually had a postmortem." In reaction, it has actually been argued that the scandal brought the concern of organ and tissue contribution into the public domain, and highlighted the benefits to medical research that result. [20] The Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal of the 1990s related to opioid deaths. [21]

The Stafford Hospital scandal in Stafford, England in the late 2000s worried unusually high mortality rates amongst patients at the hospital. [22] [23] Up to 1200 more patients passed away in between 2005 and 2008 than would be expected for the type and size of medical facility [24] [25] based upon figures from a death design, but the final Healthcare Commission report concluded it would be misguiding to connect the inadequate care to a specific number or variety of numbers of deaths. [26] A public inquiry later revealed multiple circumstances of disregard, incompetence and abuse of clients. [27]

" Lack of independence of examining for safety and physical fitness for purpose"

Unlike in Scotland and Wales which have actually degenerated health care, NHS England is worked on behalf of the taxpayer by the UK Parliament and the Department of Health, at the head of which is the Secretary of State for Health.

The group charged in England and Wales with checking if the care provided by the NHS is genuinely safe and healthy for function is the Care Quality Commission, or CQC. Although the CQC explains itself as the "independent regulator of all health and social care services in England" [1], it remains in truth "responsible to the public, Parliament and the Secretary of State for Health." [2] Archived 31 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine and much of its financing comes from the taxpayer. At least one chairman, one chief executive [3] and a board member [4] of the CQC have actually been singled out for attention by a UK Secretary of State for Health.

There is therefore the potential for a conflict of interest, as both the NHS and the CQC have the exact same management and both are extremely prone to political interference.

In April 2024, Health Secretary Victoria Atkins prompted NHS England to focus on proof and security in gender dysphoria treatment following concerns raised by the Cass Review. NHS required cooperation from adult centers and started a review, with Labour supporting evidence-based care. Momentum slammed restrictions on gender-affirming care, while Stonewall invited the review's focus on kids's wellness. [28] [29]

See likewise

National Health Service
List of healthcare facilities in England
Healthcare in the UK
Private Finance Initiative
Care Quality Commission


Notes

^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "TCSR 07 - Health: The Public Expects". theinformationdaily.com. 24 September 2007. Archived from the initial on 22 August 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Schneider, Antonius; Donnachie, Ewan; Tauscher, Martin; Gerlach, Roman; Maier, Werner; Mielck, Andreas; Linde, Klaus; Mehring, Michael (9 June 2016). "Costs of coordinated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: results of a routine information analysis in Bavaria". BMJ Open. 6 (6 ): e011621. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011621. PMC 4908874. PMID 27288386.
^ "Tougher rules to guarantee that individuals do not abuse NHS services". Medical News Today. 26 April 2004. Archived from the original on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Health travelers might get refund". BBC News Online. 7 December 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Jones, George (21 February 2007). "Doctors assault Blair's waiting list pledge". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)". National Library for Health. March 2006. Archived from the original on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "So what is a QALY?". Bandolier. Archived from the original on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Do hospitals make you ill?". BBC News. 31 January 2019.
^ "Hospital deep cleansing under fire". 14 January 2008.
^ "NHS 'postcode lottery'". politics.co.uk. 9 August 2006. Archived from the original on 7 September 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Why some drugs are not worth it". BBC News. 9 March 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Cancer drug turned down for NHS usage". BBC News Online. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Q&A: The Herceptin judgement". BBC News. 12 April 2006. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ "Update on Herceptin appraisal". National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Archived from the original on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 1 December 2006.
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "New generation surgery-centres to perform thousands more NHS operations every year". Department of Health. 3 December 2002. Archived from the initial on 5 March 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ George Monbiot (10 March 2002). "Private Affluence, Public Rip-Off". The Spectator. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
^ PublicFinance.co.uk. "PFI healthcare facilities 'costing NHS additional ₤ 480m a year'". Retrieved 3 December 2014.
^ Dixon, B. (19 March 2001). "Checks and balances required for organ retention". Current Biology. 11 (5 ): R151 - R152. Bibcode:2001 CBio ... 11. R151D. doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822( 01 )00078-1. PMID 11267877.
^ "Gosport health center deaths: Police corruption probe flawed, guard dog states". BBC News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
^ Nick Triggle (6 February 2013). "Stafford Hospital: Hiding mistakes 'ought to be criminal offence'". BBC. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ QC (6 February 2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Report). House of Commons. ISBN 9780102981476. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Smith, Rebecca (18 March 2009). "NHS targets 'may have caused 1,200 deaths' in Mid-Staffordshire". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the initial on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
^ Emily Cook (18 March 2009). "Stafford health center scandal: Up to 1,200 may have died over "stunning" patient care". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
^ "The number of individuals died "unnecessarily" at Mid Staffs". Full Fact. 7 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
^ Sawer, Patrick; Donnelly, Laura (2 October 2011). "Boss of scandal-hit healthcare facility leaves cross-examination". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 3 October 2011.
^ "Minister tells NHS to 'end culture of secrecy' on gender care as focus shifts to adult clinics". Morning Star. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
^ "NHS England must end 'culture of secrecy' in kids's gender care". The National. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
References

Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.


External links

NHS.


Further reading

Pollock, Allyson (2004 ). NHS plc: the privatisation of our healthcare. Verso. ISBN 1-84467-539-4.
Mandelstam, Michael (2006 ). Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned. Jessica Kingsley Publishing. ISBN 1-84310-482-2.